
Congratulations to WALL-E for its Best Picture win from the Los Angeles Film Critics Association. Who knew that a movie filled with trash could be so seductive?
Of course, when assembled by the fine folks at Pixar, it’s hardly surprising at all.
A joke going around Hollywood (so I hear from Beijing) is that some of the Los Angeles film critics voted for the movie they saw in the first half of WALL-E, while the other film critics voted for the movie they saw in the second half of WALL-E.
Clearly, this film suffered from a case of split identity, but I don’t think it was WALL-E’s sojourn into outer space that made it seem like two different films. Rather, I believe that it was something more fundamental: WALL-E is a weak hero - not in the “good” sense, but in a poor storytelling sense. And coming from the fine folks at Pixar, that is surprising.
In a good film, EVERYTHING should impact upon, and emanate from, an active hero. Unfortunately in WALL-E, we have a rather reactive “hero” from whom much is taken and little is given. Eve completely steals the action from WALL-E, who is left with little more to do than be in the right or wrong place at the right or wrong time. But the biggest flaw in WALL-E is this: the REALIZATION moment of the film lives not with the hero (where it should), but with a secondary character: the corpulent captain of the Axiom. What does WALL-E learn? Apparently nothing. And how does WALL-E feel about humans after discovering that they abandoned him to clean up after the party? We’ll never know. As in Forrest Gump, “Stupid is as stupid does.” WALL-E merely gets his memory back to square one, and is satisfied to finally hold hands with Eve while self-indulgent humans stand gleefully around a seedling that is sure to be wiped out in the next massive dust storm (forgot about those?). So, we can expect WALL-E2 to feature the humans ditching earth again after pizzas fail to grow on trees.
But, hey, at least the fire extinguisher gag was cute.